Why lions form groups: food is not enough
Craig Packer, David Scheel, Anne Pusey · The American Naturalist · 1990
This influential analysis asked what selective pressures favour group living in lions, testing whether shared hunting and prey capture alone could explain sociality. Long-term Serengeti and Ngorongoro data showed that foraging benefits were insufficient to account for pride sizes, and that defence of territory, cub protection against infanticidal males, and competition between groups were stronger drivers. The paper reframed lion sociality as a product of intergroup conflict and reproductive defence rather than cooperative hunting, an argument that reshaped carnivore social-evolution theory. It remains a foundational reference for why the lion is the only truly social felid.
Species
Category:behavior-cognition
Related articles
- Personality structure across wild and domestic felid speciesbehavior-cognition
- The hyoid apparatus and the ability to roar in big catsbehavior-cognition
- Communal cub rearing and non-offspring nursing in lionsbehavior-cognition
- Complex cooperation among territorial lionsbehavior-cognition
- Research overview: cooperative hunting and role specialisation in lionsbehavior-cognition
- Female counterstrategies to infanticide in lionsbehavior-cognition
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.