Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes
A. Cole Burton, Eric Neilson, Dario Moreira, Andrew Ladle, Robin Steenweg, et al. · Journal of Applied Ecology · 2015
View source ↗Burton and colleagues synthesized the rapidly expanding camera-trap literature, evaluating how studies define their sampling, handle detection, and connect raw detections to the ecological quantities researchers actually care about, such as abundance, occupancy, and behavior. They cautioned against naive use of detection rates as abundance indices without accounting for detection probability and survey design, and offered recommendations to strengthen inference and reporting. The review mapped methodological strengths and weaknesses across hundreds of studies, highlighting common pitfalls and best practices. By clarifying the chain from camera detections to ecological conclusions, it became one of the most influential and widely cited methodological reviews in the field, frequently used to justify analytical choices and improve study rigor.
Category:camera-trap-methods
Related articles
- Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and passive sensor datacamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studiescamera-trap-methods
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchcamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populationscamera-trap-methods
- Random versus game trail-based camera trap placement for monitoring terrestrial mammal communitiescamera-trap-methods
- Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentinacamera-trap-methods
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.