New directions for zoo animal welfare science
Whitham JC, Wielebnowski N · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · 2013
Whitham and Wielebnowski argued that zoo welfare assessment should move beyond minimising negative states toward measuring and promoting positive welfare, and toward individual-level, continuous monitoring. They reviewed available behavioural and physiological indicators, advocated combining multiple measures, and emphasised practical tools that keepers can use routinely, such as behavioural monitoring and validated rating scales. The paper called for the field to develop indicators of positive affective states, not just stress, and to embed welfare assessment in everyday management. It became an influential roadmap for modern zoo welfare science. For felids it supports integrating cortisol, behaviour, personality and keeper assessments into ongoing, individualised welfare tracking rather than one-off studies.
Category:captive-care-welfare
Related articles
- Research overview: discrimination learning and cognition in big catsbehavior-cognition
- Research overview: sexually selected infanticide across felidsbehavior-cognition
- The hyoid apparatus and the ability to roar in big catsbehavior-cognition
- A common rule for the scaling of carnivore densitybig-cat-ecology
- Research overview: elevational replacement among leopards, snow leopards, and tigersbig-cat-ecology
- Behavioural correlates of predation by tiger, leopard, and dhole in Nagaraholebig-cat-ecology
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.