Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide
Adrian Treves, K. Ullas Karanth · Conservation Biology · 2003
View source ↗Treves and Karanth reviewed human-carnivore conflict and management approaches across continents, synthesising how societies have responded to large predators from persecution to protection. They examined the ecological and social drivers of conflict, livestock depredation, attacks on people, and competition for game, and surveyed management tools including lethal control, regulated hunting, compensation, husbandry, and zoning. The review argued for integrated, regionally tailored strategies that account for both carnivore biology and human values, and for moving beyond reflexive killing toward coexistence-oriented management. Widely cited as a field-defining synthesis, it helped establish human-carnivore conflict as a central theme in conservation biology and framed the trade-offs in managing predators alongside people.
Category:human-wildlife-conflict
Related articles
- Research overview: discrimination learning and cognition in big catsbehavior-cognition
- Research overview: sexually selected infanticide across felidsbehavior-cognition
- The hyoid apparatus and the ability to roar in big catsbehavior-cognition
- Research overview: play behaviour and development in captive big catsbehavior-cognition
- Research overview: comparative cognition across the cat familybehavior-cognition
- Research overview: comparative vocal repertoires across the cat familybehavior-cognition
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.