Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data
Jacqueline L. Frair, John Fieberg, Mark Hebblewhite, Francesca Cagnacci, Nicholas J. DeCesare, Luca Pedrotti · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · 2010
This methodological review tackled two pervasive problems in GPS telemetry: locations are imprecise, and the probability of obtaining a fix at all depends on habitat, terrain, and canopy. Left uncorrected, these biases distort estimates of habitat selection and movement, because failed fixes are not missing at random. The authors compiled approaches to quantify and correct location error and fix-rate bias, including modeling fix success as a function of environmental covariates and weighting analyses accordingly. For felid studies in forested or rugged terrain, where dense cover suppresses fixes, the guidance is directly relevant. The paper is a practical companion to the broader critiques of telemetry, turning abstract warnings into concrete analytical remedies.
Species
Category:movement-ecology-tracking
Related articles
- Research overview: accelerometer behavioral classification in felidsmovement-ecology-tracking
- Research overview: autocorrelation and home-range estimator biasmovement-ecology-tracking
- Integrated step selection analysis: bridging the gap between resource selection and animal movementmovement-ecology-tracking
- Research overview: bandwidth selection for kernel home-range estimationmovement-ecology-tracking
- Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behaviormovement-ecology-tracking
- Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challengesmovement-ecology-tracking
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.