Modelling species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection
Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita · Ecography · 2017
Guillera-Arroita reviewed how imperfect detection affects inference about species distributions, range dynamics, and community composition, and how occupancy-style models correct the resulting biases. She explained that ignoring non-detection leads to underestimated occupancy and distorted habitat relationships, problems acutely relevant to camera-trap surveys of elusive cats that are easily missed. The review covered single-season, dynamic, multi-species, and integrated approaches, clarifying when accounting for detection is essential and when simpler methods suffice. It connected statistical detection modeling to the practical goals of mapping and monitoring biodiversity. As an authoritative synthesis bridging detection theory and distribution modeling, the paper is widely cited and helps camera-trap researchers appreciate why and how to incorporate detection into distributional and community analyses.
Category:camera-trap-methods
Related articles
- Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and passive sensor datacamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studiescamera-trap-methods
- Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processescamera-trap-methods
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchcamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populationscamera-trap-methods
- Random versus game trail-based camera trap placement for monitoring terrestrial mammal communitiescamera-trap-methods
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.