A simple method for estimating the effective detection distance of camera traps
Tim R. Hofmeester, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Patrick A. Jansen · Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation · 2019
Hofmeester and colleagues addressed a key parameter for density methods like the Random Encounter Model and distance sampling: how far in front of a camera animals are actually detected. Because the passive infrared sensor's reach varies with species size, temperature, vegetation, and camera model, assuming a fixed detection distance introduces bias. They proposed a straightforward field and analytical method to estimate the effective detection distance directly from the data, using the distribution of distances at which animals first appear. This calibration improves the accuracy of recognition-free density estimates that depend on detection-zone geometry. The paper is a practical, widely cited contribution that helps researchers quantify a previously hand-waved quantity and produce more reliable unmarked-density estimates.
Category:camera-trap-methods
Related articles
- Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and passive sensor datacamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studiescamera-trap-methods
- Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processescamera-trap-methods
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchcamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populationscamera-trap-methods
- Random versus game trail-based camera trap placement for monitoring terrestrial mammal communitiescamera-trap-methods
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.