Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one
Darryl I. MacKenzie, James D. Nichols, Gideon B. Lachman, Sam Droege, J. Andrew Royle, Catherine A. Langtimm · Ecology · 2002
View source ↗MacKenzie and colleagues introduced the occupancy modeling framework that revolutionized how ecologists analyze presence-absence and camera-trap detection-nondetection data. They recognized that failing to detect a species at a site does not prove absence, and built a likelihood that simultaneously estimates the probability a site is occupied and the per-visit probability of detection given occupancy. Repeated surveys at each site provide the information to separate these parameters. For camera trapping, where rare cats are easily missed, this corrects the systematic underestimation that plagues naive occupancy maps. The model accommodates site and survey covariates, enabling inference about habitat associations. It is among the most influential statistical papers in wildlife ecology and underpins the majority of occupancy-based felid distribution studies.
Category:camera-trap-methods
Related articles
- Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and passive sensor datacamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studiescamera-trap-methods
- Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processescamera-trap-methods
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchcamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populationscamera-trap-methods
- Random versus game trail-based camera trap placement for monitoring terrestrial mammal communitiescamera-trap-methods
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.