How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?
Rahel Sollmann, Beth Gardner, Jerrold L. Belant · PLOS ONE · 2012
Sollmann, Gardner, and Belant used simulation to investigate how the configuration of camera arrays affects the accuracy and precision of spatially explicit capture-recapture density estimates. They varied detector spacing, array extent, and number of detectors relative to the spatial scale of animal movement, identifying designs that minimize bias and maximize precision. A central lesson is that spacing must be tuned to sigma so that individuals are detected at multiple stations, providing the spatial recaptures SECR needs, and arrays must be large enough to encompass several home ranges. The study offered concrete, generalizable design guidance for camera-trap surveys of wide-ranging carnivores and is a standard reference cited when justifying station layout in felid density studies.
Category:camera-trap-methods
Related articles
- Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and passive sensor datacamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studiescamera-trap-methods
- Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processescamera-trap-methods
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchcamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populationscamera-trap-methods
- Random versus game trail-based camera trap placement for monitoring terrestrial mammal communitiescamera-trap-methods
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.