Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet's biodiversity with networks of remote sensors
Robin Steenweg, Mark Hebblewhite, Roland Kays, Jorge Ahumada, Jason T. Fisher, et al. · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · 2017
View source ↗Steenweg and colleagues argued for treating camera traps as a globally coordinated biodiversity sensor network rather than isolated local tools. They reviewed how standardized protocols, shared data infrastructure, and consistent analytical frameworks could let camera traps deliver continental and global indicators of mammal distribution and abundance, analogous to remote-sensing networks for climate. The paper identified obstacles including incompatible metadata, varied study designs, and data-sharing reluctance, and proposed solutions to overcome them. It helped galvanize initiatives toward interoperable camera-trap monitoring and data standards. As a forward-looking synthesis, it framed the strategic case for large-scale collaboration and is widely cited in discussions of camera-trap networks, biodiversity indicators, and the future of wildlife monitoring.
Category:camera-trap-methods
Related articles
- Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and passive sensor datacamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studiescamera-trap-methods
- Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processescamera-trap-methods
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchcamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populationscamera-trap-methods
- Random versus game trail-based camera trap placement for monitoring terrestrial mammal communitiescamera-trap-methods
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.