Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models
Catherine C. Sun, Angela K. Fuller, J. Andrew Royle · PLOS ONE · 2014
Sun, Fuller, and Royle examined through simulation how detector spacing and array geometry affect bias and precision in spatially explicit capture-recapture estimates. They demonstrated that when detectors are spaced too far apart relative to the spatial scale of animal movement, individuals are rarely recaptured at multiple stations, degrading the spatial information SECR relies upon; when too close, the array may cover too little area. Their results reinforced the principle that spacing must be matched to sigma to produce the spatial recaptures needed for accurate density estimation. The study provided concrete guidance on configuring arrays for species with different movement scales. It is a commonly cited reference supporting design decisions in camera-trap density studies of mobile carnivores.
Category:camera-trap-methods
Related articles
- Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and passive sensor datacamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studiescamera-trap-methods
- Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processescamera-trap-methods
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchcamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populationscamera-trap-methods
- Random versus game trail-based camera trap placement for monitoring terrestrial mammal communitiescamera-trap-methods
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.