An evaluation of platforms for processing camera-trap data using artificial intelligence
Juliana Velez, William McShea, Hila Shamon, Paula J. Castiblanco-Camacho, Michael A. Tabak, et al. · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · 2023
Velez and colleagues compared the major software platforms and tools that apply artificial intelligence to camera-trap images, including options such as Wildlife Insights, MegaDetector-based pipelines, and others, evaluating their accuracy, usability, cost, species coverage, and data-management features. The study gives practitioners a practical, side-by-side appraisal to help them select tools matched to their technical capacity and project needs. It documented strengths and limitations across platforms, such as differences in how well models generalize and how much manual verification remains necessary. By benchmarking the real-world performance and ergonomics of competing systems, the paper fills a gap between method development and adoption. It is a useful, increasingly cited reference for researchers choosing an AI workflow for camera-trap data.
Category:camera-trap-methods
Related articles
- Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and passive sensor datacamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studiescamera-trap-methods
- Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processescamera-trap-methods
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchcamera-trap-methods
- Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populationscamera-trap-methods
- Random versus game trail-based camera trap placement for monitoring terrestrial mammal communitiescamera-trap-methods
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.