Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments
Newberry RC · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · 1995
Newberry argued that effective enrichment is not about adding novelty for its own sake but about increasing the biological relevance of captive environments, that is, providing opportunities for animals to perform behaviours important in their natural lives. She proposed evaluating enrichment by whether it improves biological functioning and welfare, not merely whether animals interact with it. The paper provided a rigorous conceptual definition that helped distinguish meaningful enrichment from superficial change, and it stressed measuring outcomes such as health, reproduction and behavioural normality. Widely cited across taxa, it shaped how felid and carnivore enrichment programs justify and assess their interventions, emphasising function over form.
Category:captive-care-welfare
Related articles
- To hunt or not to hunt? A feeding enrichment experiment with captive large felidscaptive-care-welfare
- Carcass feeding of captive cheetahs: effects of a naturalistic feeding program on oral health and psychological well-beingcaptive-care-welfare
- Animal welfare: concepts and measurementcaptive-care-welfare
- Effects of captivity on the behavior of wild mammalscaptive-care-welfare
- Behavioral and adrenocortical responses to environmental changes in leopard catscaptive-care-welfare
- Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory catscaptive-care-welfare
AI-curated summaries for the pride’s library — verify citations independently before citing.